Evermore in the main
IN 1959, Garrett Mattingly, a professor at Columbia University, wrote a landmark account of the Spanish Armada of 1588. No one, until now, has supplanted it. Partly this is because so little in the perception of Tudor history changed for the next 30 years. But then, seismic shifts began. Queen Elizabeth ceased to be seen as the ruler of all she surveyed. Her grasp of power, and even her competence, started to be challenged, while Protestantism is now known to have been less popular than previously thought. Foreign policy was rarely dictated by the Crown; much of it emerged from the private initiatives of merchants and adventurers. Elizabethan politics were less ideological, the queen less committed to a European Protestant cause, than Mattingly's cold-war generation had imagined.
This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline “Evermore in the main”
Discover more
Pep Guardiola, football’s greatest coach, is in a bind
A serial winner is learning how to lose
The Economist’s word of the year for 2024
The Greeks knew how to talk about politics and power
What do feta, cucumbers and cottage cheese have in common?
Social media and the internet are changing how people cook and relate to food
Germany’s former chancellor sets out to restore her reputation
But her new memoir is unlikely to change her critics’ minds
The best books of 2024, as chosen by The Economist
Readers will never think the same way again about games, horses and spies
What to read to understand Elon Musk
The world’s richest man was shaped by science fiction